Transition Pasadena
  • Home
  • Our Projects
  • News
  • Get Involved!
  • Calendar of Events
  • Pasadena 100

A Review:  From What is to What If by Rob Hopkins

7/27/2020

0 Comments

 
Written by Greg Marquez
Edited by Jadene Mayla

Rob Hopkins is a co-founder of Transition, a community organization dedicated to increasing cohesion between the forces of nature and those of humankind. In his latest book, Mr. Hopkins focuses on resolving our manufactured ills through one of our most valuable resources, our imagination. The book’s title is apt. Instead of confronting the hard and harmful complexities before us - the what is – he offers us the opportunity to consider alternatives – the what if – which embrace creativity, novelty, and a greater participation of human community in imagining the world.


There is also value to the word imagination. It is simple, clear, and everyone understands and uses it; the author uses the word as a new way of speaking about problems. Concentrating and using imaginative power is not as simple a task as might appear, though, according to Hopkins.

Over the years, and due to ever-increasing demands made for our time and attention, the capacity to imagine has decreased in the human population. Before they are placed in schools, very young children utilize their imaginations as a matter of course. It's an innate after all.  Every instance of play, or of doing, is an opportunity to exercise that capacity. In one study, according to Hopkins’ investigations, three year olds and younger were given different numbers of toys to play with. The researchers observed that many toys reduced the possibilities and styles of play among the youngsters, while a lesser number of toys increased innovation and creative play. Too many choices produced confusion among the tots. In fact, in another study, little ones were invited into a room with no toys, and soon enough playing with sofa cushions became the order of the day for their amusement.


Imagination, inbred as it may be and disposed by its very nature to expand thinking, is reduced in its influence by the media-rich, ever-more programmed world. The child is enrolled in school. Classrooms burdened with too many students do't allow for free individual expression. Antiquated teaching methods and even lesson content, which many of our grandparents were taught, do very little to extend or nourish individual imagination. Many would say it causes further atrophe.  Even in “creative” activities we see this, where adding to one’s list of accomplishments towards a job resume becomes the purpose.

To contrast this disparity in education, the author mentions a popular concept in Japan called ikigai. It is an ideal in living a life wherein loving, and doing, personal capabilities, and making a living combine to create the right balance for each individual.

Such a state might be cultivated in innovative educational systems in countries like the United States.  An institute of learning built around this ideology might not be called a school, for it would lay aside the programmed standard curriculum of our current education system.  Each student could retain the right to author his or her own education based on interest and aptitude. Such a school was set up by concerned parents in Reggio Emilia, Italy, after World War II. This school is still operating and has a 'maker center' where students utilize creative facilities and guidance to make whatever they need to realize their ideas. Projects aided by qualified guides are the core of studies, and outdoor open spaces are readily available throughout the city’s three dozen schools and toddler centers. This Reggio Emilia model is understandably popular among visitors from abroad interested in innovative education.

Hopkins also notes that for all ages taking the time to reflect, slow the thinking process, and allow for play and straying off task enhances health benefits, especially among those who suffer under stressful conditions.

In another example from the book, a Dundee, Scotland, psychiatric therapy system has been in development since 1997. Initiated by a theatre company wishing to help those with mental disorders, the founders incorporated arts into their program. Those who had been treated at Liff, the city’s psychiatric hospital, exhibited their works of art at a city gallery. Fifteen thousand people attended, and a few years later, the enterprise received funding from the National Health Service. In the process of researching his book, Hopkins visited the site and was invited to attend a day’s activities. Unlike typical psychiatric wards where individual time, space and care are at a premium, once among the attendees he saw how each was treated with warmth and personal care to create something tangible and meaningful. He and his peers were not called patients or clients, they were artists.  Those guiding them had personal experience with mental illness and so could bring their insight and compassion to their teaching. When he asked the director how exactly art helped people, her response was (abbreviated):

Art is a form of communication, a social activity, a challenge (which stimulates creativity). It is educational, therapeutic, collaborative (ideas bounce around), can be shared with the community, and meaningful in reducing isolation and improving life. Moreover, anyone can do it.

At a time when creative solutions are needed, perhaps more than ever before in the world, a tendency toward conformity as the means for settling issues could be replaced with creative use of our imaginations. Tapping into our creative powers takes focus in a landscape of distractions. Not only do many of us have the demands posed by our children, work, and societal issues, but we are also bombarded by a seemingly endless barrage of information overwhelming our senses.

Value-based labels given to most accomplishments, foisted upon us by society, industry, and an economic system, are given, proclaimed, and pronounced to us and for us. Where is our valuation of the things we do?
We must become not only aware of using and pairing our inherent gifts of imagination and creativity, but also of how to most effectively employ that capacity. In South London, members at Transition Town Tooting looked at their area of the city and noticed what they had been unaware of when buses moved along an unremarkable circular street. They asked what if… what if we had a village green right here where the buses make their turns? One question led to another, and before long, some funds were found, ukuleles (plus assorted instruments for others to join) were procured, large pots of flowers appeared, rolls of grass were laid out on the asphalt, and an agreement was arranged with the bus company to make their turns further down the busy High Street for the day. On the day of the “village green” many children came to play on the grass and people from the city joined Transitioners in comradery and celebration of what Transition organizers had done.

Such a transformation is not impossible when viewed through imaginative eyes. It was accomplished because a group of interested people decided what they wanted and didn't simply accept what someone else had been able to envision. They asked what if questions that stimulated others to ask their own.
For a fuller account of the event, go to the author’s website: www.robhopkins.net/2017/07/17

Many other examples point to applying what if questions to situations that seem unresolvable. Questions such as what if we made London a National Park? From this comes questions such as What if we could swim in all London’s canals? What if birdsong drowned out traffic noise? What if we rewilded all of London’s golf courses? What if every street had public art? What if we could grow what we need to eat right here where we live? Such questioning can be applied anywhere, and should be.

We can practice honing our imaginative skills with what if questions of our own. For example, here in Pasadena, what if we had a Maker Center where people could come in and make or repair things anytime? What if we had a group of Transition folks who connected requests from crafts people and the folks needing their skills? And what if payment could be cash, commodity or skill trade, or nothing at all?

Such questions generate solutions that are totally dependent on the people involved, rather than requiring outside resources or support.  After reading this book, I would like to encourage you to think of your own, and let’s put out what ifs together.




0 Comments

What Plastics Manufacturers Don't Want You to Know

7/27/2020

0 Comments

 
Written by the Web Master for Transition Pasadena

Last week, I interviewed Chery Auger of BanSUP.net to help her expose a real conspiracy involving plastic.  Her work focuses on alerting the public to the hidden truths behind the plastic crisis, and I wanted to help spread her message.

In the show I did with her, available at https://youtu.be/dsBDNeLyOUg, we share both the facts and the big secret that plastics manufacturers don't want the public to learn.  It reall is shocking.

Some highlights: did you know that plastics manufacturers are pushing an agenda and that it causes cancer and other serious diseases?  Watch the interview to learn the rest!  Plastics manufacturers are hiding something every person on the planet deserves to know, and Cheryl and I show you how to take effective action to halt their dangerous anti-environment, anti-health agenda.

If you want to do something right now, here are three things:

State Legislation currently in process needs your support.  Here's what you can do right now:
Meet with or send (regular mail is counted the most!) letters to your State Senators and Assemblymembers about why they should support the following bills:
  1. AB 1080 https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2CQ...
  2. SB 54 https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2CQ...
Federal Legislation is also currently in process and needs your voice.  Here's how to make an impact:
  1. Tell Your Senators and Congressional Representatives to support this bill https://www.tomudall.senate.gov/news/... https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N...

Together, with knowledge and effective action, we can help stop plastics manufacturers from desecrating our sacred planet and endangering our health.

Remember to watch the interview here to learn the full story of plastic, and help Cheryl spread the word by sharing it with your networks:  https://youtu.be/dsBDNeLyOUg

#plasticsmanufacturers
0 Comments

I Just Don't Think About It

7/27/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Written by Sylvia Holmes

Image credit Therese Brummel
Edited by Jadene Mayla



Just like all of my other projects, my interest in the carbon footprint of flying was strong enough for me to seek out scientist and author Peter Kalmus. In our April 13, 2018 Skype call, he explained that when he calculated his carbon footprint, he was surprised to discover that the biggest culprit was flying. So he made the commitment to not fly. (See his book Being The Change.) When he asked other scientists how they can square flying with what they know about climate change, they said “I just don’t think about it”.   

When I interviewed Peter over Skype I discovered that it can be hard for a scientist to give up flying. Think of all of the conferences held in other countries, all those chances to network and boost their career. 

Peter wanted to see if there were other scientists who had committed to not flying, so he started No Fly Climate Sci https://noflyclimatesci.org/ in 2017. It made him “feel less crazy” and helped him find his community.  But he wants more. He wants to change the current culture so that more scientists, and non-scientists too, will choose to not fly. 

What if it became uncool to fly? Flygskam, or “flight-shame”, is cited as the cause of reduced flights in Sweden. But in the US, the current culture ignores the disconnect.  Why is it that we can fly and not think about the damage that flying is doing to the planet through a huge per capita dose of carbon emissions? How can we change the culture, right away? 

Climate scientists are more familiar with the data and are prime candidates to start this cultural shift, hence the name of Peter’s website. But next, Peter thinks, academics in general should jump on board. That would also help because academic institutions are involved with most of the conferences that scientists fly to. 

Academic institutions could offer alternatives to flying in the form of online and local conferences for scientists. And if scientists could model this localization and digitization of climate crisis mitigation behavior, it might help the rest of us rethink our assumptions about airplane travel.  

So far 17 academic institutions have signed on at NoFlyClimateSci.org. The University of Maryland signed on and said that their ultimate goal is “to eliminate the university’s air travel carbon footprint”.
We are not all scientists or even academics. So what about the rest of us? We fly to visit our families, we fly for work, and we fly for fun. 

Maja Rosén was flying as a tourist from Sweden to Norway when she suddenly realized that the flight she was on was melting the glaciers in the very fjords she had come to see. So she started her own initiative, a website asking people to pledge not to fly. She realized that it would be easier for folks to make that pledge if it were short-term, for just one year, and only if 100,000 other people also pledged. You can do anything for just one year, right?

When 100,000 people do something, that’s a movement.  You can be a part of hers by signing the pledge. The USA version is here: https://www.flightfreeusa.org and you can read some of the many stories by people who have signed the pledge here: https://www.flightfreeusa.org/our-stories

Locally here in Pasadena, we need to start talking about flying, or rather not flying. Talking about not flying may be hard to do. We as a community can disagree due to our various lifestyles and work, etc. The decision can divide families, workplaces, and even travel companions. It may be hard to convince others or the public at large, but any of us can make a pledge about our own choice of transportation when it comes to traveling. Peter’s site is a great place to write about your own personal decision not to fly or to fly less. All are welcome to join.

Next, we need to act. US Representative Curt McCormack of Vermont took the pledge to not fly in 2020. He said “something has got to give. We have to stop talking about climate and start acting. I will keep taking Amtrak.”   

The climate crisis is a genuine climate emergency, and one of the best reasons to stop flying is to communicate that emergency via actions.  You can help spread this movement. Go to https://noflyclimatesci.org/ and tell your story of why you have decided to stop or reduce flying, and go to https://www.flightfreeusa.org and pledge to not fly in 2020.  You can also write your local elected officials and ask them for their thoughts on this topic.  You might be surprised by what they tell you when they write you back.

I invite you to think about this issue and take action.

0 Comments

    Subscribe To Our Blog

    Want to stay current with news from us on a (almost) weekly basis? Click here to subscribe to our blog feed!

    Transition Network News


    Other Resilience News



    Our Previous Posts

    July 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    October 2017
    June 2017
    January 2017
    October 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    December 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011


•  Home
•  Latest News  /  Event Photos
•  Throop Learning Garden  /  History  /  Garden Photos
•  Repair Café Pasadena  /  Photo Gallery
•  Get Involved  /  Contact Us

Creative Commons License
Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Picture
Site design: Qrys Cunningham
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photos used under Creative Commons from Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com, club125.greenbelt, Luigi Mengato, Images_of_Money, KJGarbutt, Will Merydith, Sayjack, skampy, El Coleccionista de Instantes, audreyjm529